Why the RX1 is too expensive

Started Sep 10, 2012 | Discussions thread
Highlander77
Regular MemberPosts: 126Gear list
Like?
Re: Why the RX1 is too expensive
In reply to Keto, Sep 11, 2012

Keto wrote:

The RX1 will probably have a street price of 2,600 to 2,800.

A Nikon D800 + Zeiss 35mm f/2 would be around 4,000 (the Nikon 35mm f/2 isn't great really). Plus would be a lot bigger & heavier.

A Leica M9 & Leica 35mm f/2 will set you back around 9,000 (but lacks auto-focus or video)

Considering what else is on the market it's not as ridiculous a price as people are saying.

I keep hearing all this comparisons with Nikon, Canon, Leica....etc plus lenses. Why do you people keep forgeting that an expensive lens bought for an interchangeable system can be kept for life without losing its value (actually most go up in price with time).

 Highlander77's gear list:Highlander77's gear list
Nikon D800E Sony Alpha 7S Nikon AF Nikkor 105mm f/2D DC Nikon AF-S Nikkor 50mm f/1.8G Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG HSM +1 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow