RX1 not really that expensive

Started Sep 10, 2012 | Discussions thread
D Cox
Senior MemberPosts: 7,660
Like?
Re: RX1 not really that expensive
In reply to EinsteinsGhost, Sep 10, 2012

EinsteinsGhost wrote:

GuyMcKie wrote:

True.

But the camera is an electronic device that ever dies. Then you have an expensive and useless lens.

I would say, that when something that costs $2800 dies, the cost is $2800 regardless of it having a lens with it, or not.

And at that point the question is how much it has cost you per photograph. If you shoot 50,000 photos before it dies, the cost is reasonable. If you only shoot 500, it is expensive.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow