Forum indexCanon PowerShot TalkChange forum

S100 ISO 6400 - not bad

Started 8 months ago | Discussion thread

Forum

wildplaces

Contributing Member • Posts: 830

Like?

Re: S100 ISO 6400 - not bad

In reply to seri_art, 8 months ago

I've been using Lightroom (and Adobe's conversion algorithms) but the results are not nearly as successful as yours. Can you share your standard workflow with RAWs?
--
wildplaces

http://www.pbase.com/wildplaces/galleries & http://www.wildplaces.me

Reply Reply with quote Complain

Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
S100 ISO 6400 - not bad	seri_art	8 months ago
Re: S100 ISO 6400 - not bad	Alastair Norcross	8 months ago
Re: S100 ISO 6400 - not bad	wildplaces	8 months ago
Re: S100 ISO 6400 - not bad	seri_art	8 months ago
Re: S100 ISO 6400 - not bad	wildplaces	8 months ago
re: S100 ISO 3200	seri_art	8 months ago

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

Would you move to a full frame DSLR?	150
FLICKR	91
weekly wildlife 5/19-5/26	69
Why is the 55-210 so big?	67
* this week through your m43 - 2013.05.20 *	66
Got Flowers? VOLUME 3	59
Is it OK to "steal" pictures for school ...	57
Do you change lenses in the fields?	48
Favorite walk-about lens	46
Sony A mount cameras could go mirrorless in 2014	46
OMD Shutter shock revisited...and a possible ...	46
My Friend + his daughter for retouch	44
To owners of M4/3 and D-SLRs: which came first?	39
Pentax FF rumor gaining steam	38
Omd Woes: How Prevalent?	36
Canon 10mm vs 18mm for landscapes	36
I am downright impressed.....with the X-E1!	34
Question for people who have used filters for ...	32
Why does my photo lack detail...?	32
Is the 24-70mm 2.8 a good all-around travel lens?	26