QUICK LINKS:VideosSample ImagesCamera TimelineLink Directory
connect.dpreview.com geasrshop.dpreview.com
NewsReviewsBuying GuideSample ImagesArticlesCamerasLensesPhonesPrintersSoftwareForumsGalleriesChallenges
Forum indexSony Cyber-shot TalkChange forum

RX100: iso3200 - MFNR vs manual stacking (unbelievable results!)

Started 9 months ago | Discussions thread
SolomonRa
SolomonRa
New Member • Posts: 20
Like?
Re: New test: Stacking vs ISO 800
In reply to SHood, 9 months ago

SHood wrote:

I don't take a tripod with me when I carry the RX100. Defeats the purpose of a small compact camera.

SolomonRa wrote:

SHood wrote:

Very interesting. I will definitely start using RAW for these type of static images.

What about tripod and long exposures?

Agree.

But I was not reffering to the low-light urban photography outdoors.
I thought about indoor type of static images like this still life.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted byWhen
RX100: iso3200 - MFNR vs manual stacking (unbelievable results!)
trale
9 months ago
OOCjpeg vs OOCmnfr
trale
9 months ago
Re: OOCjpeg vs OOCmnfr
trale
9 months ago
Re: OOCjpeg vs OOCmnfr
trale
9 months ago
Conclusion
trale
9 months ago
Re: Conclusion
notquiteAnsel
9 months ago
Re: Conclusion
trale
9 months ago
Re: RX100: iso3200 - MFNR vs manual stacking (unbelievable results!)
Higgins2002
9 months ago
Re: RX100: iso3200 - MFNR vs manual stacking (unbelievable results!)
danny006
9 months ago
Re: RX100: iso3200 - MFNR vs manual stacking (unbelievable results!)
Fotoloco
9 months ago
Re: RX100: iso3200 - MFNR vs manual stacking (unbelievable results!)
trale
9 months ago
Re: RX100: iso3200 - MFNR vs manual stacking (unbelievable results!)
Len_Gee
9 months ago
Re: RX100: iso3200 - MFNR vs manual stacking (unbelievable results!)
trale
9 months ago
Re: RX100: iso3200 - MFNR vs manual stacking (unbelievable results!)
Len_Gee
9 months ago
Re: RX100: iso3200 - MFNR vs manual stacking (unbelievable results!)
trale
9 months ago
Re: RX100: iso3200 - MFNR vs manual stacking (unbelievable results!)
Len_Gee
9 months ago
Re: RX100: iso3200 - MFNR vs manual stacking (unbelievable results!)
jonrobertp
9 months ago
Re: RX100: iso3200 - MFNR vs manual stacking (unbelievable results!)
trale
9 months ago
Re: RX100: iso3200 - MFNR vs manual stacking (unbelievable results!)
SHood
9 months ago
Re: RX100: iso3200 - MFNR vs manual stacking (unbelievable results!)
trale
9 months ago
Re: RX100: iso3200 - MFNR vs manual stacking (unbelievable results!)
SHood
9 months ago
New test: Stacking vs ISO 800
trale
9 months ago
Re: New test: Stacking vs ISO 800
SHood
9 months ago
Re: New test: Stacking vs ISO 800
SolomonRa
9 months ago
Re: New test: Stacking vs ISO 800
SHood
9 months ago
Re: New test: Stacking vs ISO 800
SolomonRa
9 months ago
Re: New test: Stacking vs ISO 800
trale
9 months ago
Re: RX100: iso3200 - MFNR vs manual stacking (unbelievable results!)
FrankGr
2 months ago
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow
Search on dpreview.com
Not a member? Register
dpreview TV
Featured news stories
dpreview.com
connect.dpreview.com
gearshop.dpreview.com
Editorial content
Product database
Community
About us   Write for us   FAQ   Feedback   Interest-Based Ads   Privacy   Legal
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998 - 2013 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
Mobile site