OMD has better DR than FF, so what?

Started Sep 4, 2012 | Discussions thread
texinwien
Senior MemberPosts: 2,829Gear list
Like?
Re: OMD has better DR than FF, so what?
In reply to Timur Born, Sep 5, 2012

Timur Born wrote:

Bizzarrini wrote:

I don't think that's a really fair comparison. The X10 image was taken at ISO100 and 1/100, while the E-M5 was at ISO200 and 1/400. The Fuji image therefore has received (about one stop) more light, thus cleaner shadows. Fuji pulled back the highlights to gain the DR. With the E-M5, you can do the same from the RAW files.

ISO 100 on the X10 corresponds to an analog gain of about ISO 125, ISO 200 on the E-M5 corresponds to an analog gain of about ISO 125-130.

Do you have samples from the E-M5 at 1/100 and 1/200?

 texinwien's gear list:texinwien's gear list
Canon EOS 300D Olympus OM-D E-M5 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM5 Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH +15 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow