Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
40mm f/2.8 vs 35mm f/2	irmao1	9 months ago
35mm f/2	rsn48	9 months ago
Define 'better'.	Lemming51	9 months ago
Re: Define 'better'.	arty H	9 months ago
Re: 40mm f/2.8 vs 35mm f/2	nelsonal	9 months ago
Optically superior, slightly longer vs. faster (soft) max aperture, slightly wider	graphikal	9 months ago
Re: Optically superior, slightly longer vs. faster (soft) max aperture, slightly wide	arty H	9 months ago
Re: Optically superior, slightly longer vs. faster (soft) max aperture, slightly wide	graphikal	9 months ago
Getting the shot, better than not...	rsn48	9 months ago
Re: Optically superior, slightly longer vs. faster (soft) max aperture, slightly wide	expro	9 months ago
Re: Optically superior, slightly longer vs. faster (soft) max aperture, slightly wide	itsDing	8 months ago

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

Why Canon made 1Dx best specification ... II	78
My first wedding with OMD	73
Leica Mini M	73
I would like to discuss the aesthetics of ...	71
Leica entering m4/3?	55
Is Apple getting people by their brain-balls?	52
Firmware upgrade causes AF slow down on 18-55!	49
can you tell the IQ/ISO difference game: ...	48
about new XF55/200: I've seen only now	47
2 Sigmas (19&30), or 20mm 1.7	41
Should I buy a NEX?	41
When size matters (D800 pixel count)	40
A few observations.	38
Hassy's Lunar gets real	38
*** MINI CHALLENGE 303 *** UNDER 6 MP ...	37
Just returned my 80-400mm VR AF-S lens	37
Pentax — a Japanese Leica? Not really ...	36
New Forum?	36
Seeking ways of tracking birds in flight with ...	35
What might go wrong with GX2	32