|
Re: Wide angle f2.8 zoom for NX 20?
In reply to Vitruvius,
9 months ago
|
Due to the rules of physics you would have a very tiny camera body hanging at the back of your huge but nice, bright and wide zoom lens.
What you are looking for is an immense piece of glass, very large and hugely expensive. It would be ridiculous spending this amount of money for a lens and then choosing for a non full frame sensor and body.
Just my 2 cents.
Vitruvius wrote:
I don't mind considering lagacy lenses but I have yet to find any that would by 17-35mm f2.8 on an APS-C or M4/3 camera.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago |