|
Re: Is the Canon 17-55 worth the money?
In reply to cannoneer,
9 months ago
|
I read the (numerous) reviews of both and bought the Sigma because I couldn't justify spending an extra $500 or more on nominal IQ that might or might not be perceptible.
You should also read this: http://www.lensrentals.com/rent/canon/lenses/wide-angle/sigma-17-50mm-f2.8-ex-dc-os-hsm-for-canon . I haven't noticed AF problems in low light, but I guess it depends on how "low" the light is.
--
See more at The Story's Story: http://jseliger.wordpress.com and Grant Writing Confidential: http://blog.seliger.com
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago |