Forum indexSony Cyber-shot TalkChange forum

RX100 ISO 1600/3200/6400 comparison pics... this camera is NUTS!

Started 9 months ago | Discussions thread

Forum

leafinsectman

Contributing Member • Posts: 733

Like?

Re: Flawed test!

In reply to Weegee, 9 months ago

Weegee wrote:

High ISO speeds are usually for available darkness photography. Noise hardly ever shows up in highlights. Take some shots in a bar at high ISO and I can guarantee you that you won't be so happy with the results.

The lighting in my room at the time was pretty dark. I've taken some ISO 3200 and ISO 6400 shots in dark locations and I've also been impressed with the results. I did chuckle at your 'guarantee' though, thanks for that.

--
http://danielpua.com

Reply Reply with quote Complain

Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
RX100 ISO 1600/3200/6400 comparison pics... this camera is NUTS!	leafinsectman	9 months ago
Re: RX100 ISO 1600/3200/6400 comparison pics... this camera is NUTS!	Unpopular Photography	9 months ago
Re: RX100 ISO 1600/3200/6400 comparison pics... this camera is NUTS!	Dan1964	9 months ago
Re: RX100 ISO 1600/3200/6400 comparison pics... this camera is NUTS!	leafinsectman	9 months ago
Re: RX100 ISO 1600/3200/6400 comparison pics... this camera is NUTS!	mike geier	9 months ago
Re: RX100 ISO 1600/3200/6400 comparison pics... this camera is NUTS!	leafinsectman	9 months ago
Re: RX100 ISO 1600/3200/6400 comparison pics... this camera is NUTS!	gulffish	9 months ago
Re: RX100 ISO 1600/3200/6400 comparison pics... this camera is NUTS!	leafinsectman	9 months ago
Re: RX100 ISO 1600/3200/6400 comparison pics... this camera is NUTS!	leafinsectman	9 months ago
Re: RX100 ISO 1600/3200/6400 comparison pics... this camera is NUTS!	The Skipper	9 months ago
Re: RX100 ISO 1600/3200/6400 comparison pics... this camera is NUTS!	leafinsectman	9 months ago
Re: RX100 ISO 1600/3200/6400 comparison pics... this camera is NUTS!	The Skipper	9 months ago
Flawed test!	Weegee	9 months ago
Re: Flawed test!	piccirilli	9 months ago
Re: Flawed test!	The Skipper	9 months ago
Re: Flawed test!	leafinsectman	9 months ago
Re: Flawed test!	leafinsectman	9 months ago
Weegee, huh?	harry cannoli	9 months ago
Re: Weegee, huh?	lapsa	9 months ago
Incredible indeed :)	leafinsectman	9 months ago
Re: Flawed test!	tbcass	9 months ago
hmmm	danaceb	9 months ago
Re: hmmm	danny006	9 months ago
Re: hmmm	leafinsectman	9 months ago
Re: RX100 ISO 1600/3200/6400 comparison pics... this camera is NUTS!	leafinsectman	9 months ago
1600 tops	aerorail	9 months ago
Re: 1600 tops	The Skipper	9 months ago

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

Micro Four Thirds body deflation	68
My first wedding with OMD	61
I would like to discuss the aesthetics of ...	56
Leica Mini M	53
about new XF55/200: I've seen only now	51
Firmware upgrade causes AF slow down on 18-55!	49
Leica entering m4/3?	46
Does DPreview waste your time, too?	45
Is Apple getting people by their brain-balls?	44
When size matters (D800 pixel count)	38
A few observations.	37
*** MINI CHALLENGE 303 *** UNDER 6 MP ...	37
Should I buy a NEX?	35
Seeking ways of tracking birds in flight with ...	33
2 Sigmas (19&30), or 20mm 1.7	33
What might go wrong with GX2	32
Hassy's Lunar gets real	32
Why Canon made 1Dx best specification ... II	31
Just returned my 80-400mm VR AF-S lens	30
New Forum?	30