Steve Huff reviews the 12-35 2.8

Started Aug 10, 2012 | Discussions thread
Veteran MemberPosts: 8,024Gear list
Re: This lens really isn't expensive....
In reply to peevee1, Aug 10, 2012

peevee1 wrote:

papillon_65 wrote:

compared to comparable zooms elsewhere, that is to say constant aperture F2.8 zooms in this range with this quality. You've read what he said, it competes with lenses much more expensive

No, it does not really compete with professional FF f/2.8 zooms. It competes with APS-C zooms though, and Sony DT 16-50/2.8 can be had for $618 (or less in a kit).

You keep listing that one example that proves your point while ignoring the other 10 examples that don't. Canon's 17-55 IS goes for about $1100. Nikon's 17-55 goes for $1400. Pentax 16-50 is $900. The newest 24-70's for Full frame go for close to $2k these days. Panasonic is probably milking it a little bit, but premium lenses are often premium priced.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow