FZ200 samples

Started Aug 7, 2012 | Discussions thread
gkreth
Senior MemberPosts: 2,977
Like?
Re: Resizing bad?
In reply to jakesan, Aug 9, 2012

jakesan wrote:

I have found that resizing, even a small amount, is very very bad for fine detail. Very bad.
-Create a blank sheet in Photoshop (or editor of choice).
-Draw some 1-pixel wide lines to represent fine detail.
-Be sure to put in some vertical and horizontal lines.
-Draw some wider lines and some other shapes.
-Resize it 1% or 50%, it doesn't matter. Try .1% if you have doubts.
-Now look at your lines (yes, pixel peep).
Yuck

You can do some sharpening but sorry, the "real" detail is already gone. Sharpening in this case is a bandaid.

The IQ difference is noticable with real photos even on snapshot size prints.
When critically evaluating IQ using resized images is useless.
... which is why Panasonic is not allowing it.

I'm confused by this.

So, are you saying that, for a 4x6 photo printed on a 300 dpi printer, that photo HAS to be taken at 1200 x 1800, about 2 MP?

Doesn't printing a 10MP, 14MP, etc. photo on a printer in essence resize the photo?

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
PoorNew
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow