|
Re: The Tamron 17-50 VC version is really a great lens
In reply to ultimitsu,
9 months ago
|
Fabulous resized results, ultimitsu, with the 17-55 IS in low light at 1/5 sec, 17mm, f/2.8 ISO 1600.
I've added a quick snap from yesterday at 1/25 sec, 17mm, f/2.8 ISO 400, with the Tamron 17-50 VC and T4i.
ultimitsu wrote:
These images look nice, however they do not assist your point -
1, they are taken at F5.6 to F8, this is a F2.8 lens, and it is the F2.8 sharpness that is the center of the issue. if F5.6 to F8 sharpnes is all that matters then canon 18-55 IS would suffice.
2, they are taken in 1/400 to 1/1000 SS, that does not indicate how good IS is.
3, they are all 1800x1200, that is 1/8 the full resolution. with a bit of post-processing, even a mediocre lens would look quite sharp when downsized this much.
Here is a 1/5s F2.8 image from 17-55 IS. it is not full res but at iso1600 you wouldnt want to see full res anyway.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 months ago | |||
| 10 months ago | |||
| 10 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago |
   |
|
Connect with dpreview
|
