How good are 4/3 lenses on m4/3?

Started Jul 31, 2012 | Discussions thread
Dixa
Contributing MemberPosts: 808
Like?
Re: How good are 4/3 lenses on m4/3?
In reply to Klarno, Aug 2, 2012

read what LL has to say about regular 4/3 lenses on the e-m5

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/olympus_om_d_e_m5_review.shtml

Klarno wrote:

I use the Olympus 14-54 f/2.8-3.5 II, which focuses at least as fast as the slowest m4/3 native lenses. It's a decent, eminently usable performer for autofocus, and has no faults for image quality at its price.

I also use the Olympus 11-22 f/2.8-3.5, which is slow to focus but quite accurate. Some easily corrected CA, great resolution, admirably low distortion. Interestingly it focuses faster on the E-PL1 than it does on the GH2.

I used the Olympus 40-150 f/4.0-5.6, but after getting frustrated with its mechanics I upgraded to the Micro Four Thirds version, which has optics of equally very high quality in a much better constructed shell.

I used the Sigma 18-50 f/2.8, which, while a great lens optically, was a very poor AF performer on Micro Four Thirds (it would not focus accurately at the long end), and I sold it to get the 14-54.
--
http://www.photoklarno.com

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow