"PDAF wasn’t nearly as accurate as CDAF"

Started Aug 1, 2012 | Discussions thread
Lights
Veteran MemberPosts: 3,270Gear list
Like?
Re: Duh...everyone knows that already....
In reply to 007peter, Aug 1, 2012

007peter wrote:

I don't understand why you're making a big deal out of this? The fact that CDAF (contrast detection) is more accurate than PDAF (phase detection) is practically a common knowledge for people in both mirror-less and canon dslr world.

As a long time canon dslr user, canon even recommend using its CDAF Live View plus 10x magnification for critical macro shot. Again, no surprised here.

The big advantage of PDAF lies in Continuous Directional Tracking , something CDAF just doesn't do well.

Yep
--

http://www.pbase.com/madlights
http://barriolson.aminus3.com/
"why so serious?": The Joker

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow