14-24 mm vs 16-35 mm

Started Jul 22, 2012 | Discussions thread
pc168
Senior MemberPosts: 2,273
Like?
16-35 mm is a better choice
In reply to D L Miller, Aug 1, 2012

I will not consider 14-24 :

  • too heavy

  • cannot use filter to protect the front element (very important)

  • range is too short

  • f2.8 is nice to have but not that necessary (but then no VR)

  • quite expensive

I will go for 16-35 (indeed I'm using it) :

  • not too heavy

  • can use filter

  • range is okay for an ultra wide angle zoom

  • VR is very useful

  • less expensive

The 16-35 is a very sharp UWA zoom in its class.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow