18 hours ago
|
Re: my Lumix 12-35 is staying......
In reply to Button Pusher,
9 months ago
|
It was a hypothetical question. For the small amount in DOF difference, are you willing to tolerate the huge cost difference? I know what I think.
Button Pusher
wrote:
How about you go and take them, upload them here, and prove your theory?
psicotec wrote:
Couldn't all these have been taken with an LX5 or an Sony RX100 for half the price? Or am I mistaken?
ovidiu ispas wrote:
just got it 2 days ago...here are some tests at 2.8...majority.
From perspective of social activities like parties, bbq, lots of people around, i find primes very good but always missing shots and not fun changing lenses constant.
The 12-35 will fill that niche.....
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago |
   |
|
Connect with dpreview
|
