G1X vs. Eos M

Started Jul 24, 2012 | Discussions thread
deep7
Contributing MemberPosts: 694Gear list
Like?
Re: Potential EOS M Advantages vs G1 X
In reply to justmeMN, Jul 26, 2012

justmeMN wrote:

The EOS M shouldn't have the close-focusing limitations and inconveniences of G1 X.

The EOS M may have slowish AF, but it's probably faster than the G1 X.

The EOS M has a slightly larger sensor, so it may have slightly better IQ.

EF-M lenses are threaded. They don't require an adaptor like the G1 X.

The close-focussing implementation of the G1X is poorly done but, in practice, it actually isn't a big issue for me. Would be if I was doing photos of friends across a table!

People keep saying focus of G1X is slow. It's absolutely fine, generally quicker than a 55-250 lens on a 60D, for example. It's also super-reliable and I never miss a shot.

Bigger sensor should give a theoretical advantage, agreed. In practice it would be more lens-dependant.

That G1X adaptor made me very grumpy. It took three months to arrive after I ordered it (naughty Canon NZ, why say something is available when it's not?) and, when it did arrive, I was stunned to find my $49 had only bought an amazingly flimsy little piece of plastic which should have come free with the camera anyway!
--
Don.

A Land Rover, a camera ... I'm happy!

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
G1XNew
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow