Small, lower cost m4/3 body

Started Jul 17, 2012 | Discussions thread
Ulfric M Douglas
Senior MemberPosts: 3,860
Re: Small, lower cost m4/3 body
In reply to Allan Brown, Jul 22, 2012

Allan Brown wrote:

Well, I and many others believe that the "outstanding JPEG engine" is a farce. The EPM1 default OOC JPGs are over sharpened, over saturated and heavily de-noised. Compared to my G3, the photos were pathetic. I had to adjust the camera to get reasonable results.

G3 needs adjusting, e-pM1 needs adjusting, G1 needs adjusting ... to get the best OOC Jpegs for each user.
No genius here, and the G3 is just as bad as the other two.

The WB is still "iffy" and is no better than the Panasonic's.

Whitebalance of the e-pM1 is the best I have EVER seen , from any camera. You are plainly and completely wrong.

The SCP is much about the same as the Panasonic "Q" menu except that you can customise the "Q" menu. You cannot do that with the SCP.

SCP is nothing like the Lumix Quick menu. I also use a G1, Q menu is kinda normal and kinda useful. SCP is solidly better.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow