12 hours ago
|
Re: Upcoming Fuji 10-24 w/ OIS
In reply to icott,
11 months ago
|
alright. looks like the 13mm that nikon only ever made 350 of in history is wider, but that's actually 13.3mm. and until this sigma lens came out in 2004, which i did not know about, it was the widest lens for FF, according to ken rockwell.
what other primes have there been at 13.5mm and wider?
icott wrote:
spacenegroes wrote:
how can you see "10-22mm" and think "fullframe"? there has never been even a prime lens wider than 14mm on fullframe i don't think. or maybe there was a 13.5mm once. certainly not zoom.
Sigma 12-24mm is a full frame lens plus there have been many primes wider than 14mm over the years.
Ian.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 months ago | |||
| 11 months ago | |||
| 11 months ago | |||
| 11 months ago | |||
| 11 months ago | |||
| 11 months ago | |||
| 11 months ago | |||
| 11 months ago | |||
| 11 months ago | |||
| 11 months ago | |||
| 11 months ago | |||
| 11 months ago | |||
| 11 months ago | |||
| 11 months ago | |||
| 11 months ago | |||
| 11 months ago |
   |
|
Connect with dpreview
|
