|
Re: Tamron performance
In reply to DAVEBUCK,
10 months ago
|
Uh, you might want to recheck Photozone. They rated the 18-200 at 1.5, and the 15-85 at 3.5. The 18-200 suffers, as do all superzooms, from a collection of compromises necessary to get the overall range; that doesn't make it a bad lens, it just makes it a lens that emphasizes convenience over image quality. The bottom line is that, barring QC issues, your 18-200 should be thoroughly outclassed by the 15-85.
--
WLW
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 months ago | |||
| 10 months ago | |||
| 10 months ago | |||
| 10 months ago | |||
| 10 months ago | |||
| 10 months ago | |||
| 10 months ago | |||
| 10 months ago | |||
| 10 months ago | |||
| 10 months ago | |||
| 10 months ago | |||
| 10 months ago | |||
| 10 months ago | |||
| 10 months ago | |||
| 10 months ago | |||
| 10 months ago | |||
| 10 months ago | |||
| 10 months ago | |||
| 10 months ago | |||
| 10 months ago | |||
| 10 months ago | |||
| 10 months ago | |||
| 10 months ago | |||
| 10 months ago | |||
| 10 months ago | |||
| 10 months ago | |||
| 10 months ago |