
4 hours ago
|
Re: used 16-35 or new 16-35 II?
In reply to DidierV,
11 months ago
|
Mmmm, from what I can see the first version isn't that bad, but I need the best quality especially at f/2.8 and to the wide side of the lens... so.... I think I have to buy the mkII version, sigh!
damn expensive lenses ;-PPP
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 months ago | |||
| 11 months ago | |||
| 11 months ago | |||
| 11 months ago | |||
| 11 months ago | |||
| 11 months ago | |||
| 11 months ago | |||
| 11 months ago | |||
| 11 months ago | |||
| 11 months ago | |||
| 11 months ago | |||
| 11 months ago | |||
| 11 months ago | |||
| 11 months ago | |||
| 11 months ago | |||
| 10 months ago | |||
| 10 months ago |