Canon 16-35L vs 17-40, and 70-300L

Started Jul 5, 2012 | Discussions thread
bronxbombers
Forum ProPosts: 18,226
Like?
Re: Canon 16-35L vs 17-40, and 70-300L
In reply to gatorowl, Jul 20, 2012

yeah for all the amazing bodies nikon makes now they are sorely lacking some lenses, worst of all the 70-300L (or at least a 70-200 f/4 IS)!

gatorowl wrote:
+1

I have the 70-200 f4 as well as the L lens, and frankly I see little reason to keep the 70-200 because the 70-300L is so good.

The Nikon folks keep clamoring for a 70-200 f4, but if they tried the 70-300L, they'd want a version of that lens instead.

Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee wrote:

17-40 fine for me.

I have 70-300 L. Sharp edge to edge wide open at all FL. Brilliant lens

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow