Forum indexMicro Four Thirds TalkChange forum

OM-D: The case against Auto ISO

Started 10 months ago | Discussion thread

Forum

MrSynthetic

Junior Member • Posts: 49

Like?

Re: You didn't try this, right? (It doesn't work.)

In reply to Paul De Bra, 10 months ago

Yes it is (you have to activate it, though)

Paul De Bra wrote:

Sounds logical that you would set say 1/125s, f/8 and then let the camera choose an ISO value to get correct exposure. Alas, auto ISO is not available in M mode .

--
Slowly learning to use the Olympus OM-D E-M5.
Public pictures at http://debra.zenfolio.com/ .

--
http://www.flickr.com/photos/76977800@N04/

Reply Reply with quote Complain

Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
OM-D: The case against Auto ISO	Thomas Niemann	10 months ago
or use at M mode with Auto ISO (nt)	radix1	10 months ago
You didn't try this, right? (It doesn't work.)	Paul De Bra	10 months ago
Re: You didn't try this, right? (It doesn't work.)	MrSynthetic	10 months ago
My bad. Found it now!	Paul De Bra	10 months ago
Auto ISO in M is available but needs to be activated, default is PAS (nt)	acahaya	10 months ago
:) (nt)	radix1	10 months ago
Re: or use at M mode with Auto ISO (nt)	MrSynthetic	10 months ago
Re: or use at M mode with Auto ISO (nt)	radix1	10 months ago
Re: or use at M mode with Auto ISO (nt)	Rriley	10 months ago
Re: OM-D: The case against Auto ISO	TEBnewyork	10 months ago
Good points	Thomas Niemann	10 months ago
Re: OM-D: The case against Auto ISO	Clayton1985	10 months ago
Re: OM-D: The case against Auto ISO	highwave	10 months ago
Re: It actually works fine for the candids I usually take, but could be better	sean000	10 months ago
Re: It actually works fine for the candids I usually take, but could be better	Timur Born	10 months ago
Re: It actually works fine for the candids I usually take, but could be better	RobbieV	10 months ago
Re: It actually works fine for the candids I usually take, but could be better	sean000	10 months ago
Re: It actually works fine for the candids I usually take, but could be better	Timur Born	10 months ago
Re: It actually works fine for the candids I usually take, but could be better	sean000	10 months ago
Re: OM-D: The case against Auto ISO	assaft	10 months ago
Re: OM-D: The case against Auto ISO	rrr_hhh	10 months ago
Re: OM-D: The case against Auto ISO	assaft	10 months ago
Re: OM-D: The case against Auto ISO	rrr_hhh	10 months ago
Re: Auto-ISO is great when you want to be in the shot.	sean000	10 months ago
Re: Auto-ISO is great when you want to be in the shot.	assaft	10 months ago
Re: Auto-ISO is great when you want to be in the shot.	Timur Born	10 months ago
Re: OM-D: The case against Auto ISO	assaft	10 months ago
It is simple	Loga	10 months ago
There are only 2 problems.	Najinsky	10 months ago
Re: OM-D: The case against Auto ISO	archeogeolab	10 months ago
Re: OM-D: The case against Auto ISO	highwave	10 months ago
Re: OM-D: The case against Auto ISO	Timur Born	10 months ago
Re: OM-D: The case against Auto ISO	sigala1	10 months ago
Re: OM-D: The case against Auto ISO	Gregm61	10 months ago
Or...	OniMirage	10 months ago
Re: Or...	highwave	10 months ago
Re: Or...	OniMirage	10 months ago

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

Do you change lenses in the fields?	82
Why are DSLRs left home 90.2% of the time	67
This is why to shoot in RAW	60
Macro lens for micro four thirds, any good choice?	58
Why does my photo lack detail...?	56
Does anybody shoot 16:9?	55
Struggling with new AF-S 80-400mm	54
My GR Just Arrived - Some Quick Full Size ...	47
I see alot of mistakes in composition on this ...	47
What's your favorite full frame walkaround lens?	43
I sold my Canon...	41
It's time to stop whining about Adobe. . .	41
A "film-like" quality : Voigtländer 17.5mm ...	37
E-P5 anyone?	37
R.I.P. Professional Photographers	36
Panasonic 14/2.5	35
* Wed C&C (No Theme) Thread, Ed. 265, 13 05 22 *	35
NYC Nightscapes	34
The new normal.	33
NEX-6 or NEX-7?	31