300mm f2.8 OR 200-400mm f4

Started Jun 20, 2012 | Discussions thread
mikew
Contributing MemberPosts: 547Gear list
Like?
If doing birds in flight, get the 300.
In reply to rpo, Jun 24, 2012

I have had the 200-400 for 4 years and used it all over the world, from Africa to India and the Antarctic. It has always produced images with all the sharpness you could ask for. But this past April I did some concentrated BIF photography with it and I found I was unable to track flying birds nearly as well as I could with a rented 300 2.8 lens. I think it is the weight and balance of the 200-400 that is hindering me. When shooting still subjects the weight can be a stabilizing advantage. But for flying birds, I got nowhere near the success rate I had with the 300. Not even close. I think it's because I could not alter the speed of the 200-400 as well as I could with the 300. The 300 weighs only a bit less, but the balance is very different.

For static subjects the 200-400 has its own advantages. It focuses very close for great magnification.
Both lenses will produce world class images.

 mikew's gear list:mikew's gear list
Nikon D4 Nikon D800 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 600mm f/4G ED VR Nikon AF-S Nikkor 50mm f/1.4G Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II +10 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow