QUICK LINKS:VideosSample ImagesCamera TimelineLink Directory
connect.dpreview.com geasrshop.dpreview.com
NewsReviewsBuying GuideSample ImagesArticlesCamerasLensesPrintersSoftwareForumsGalleriesChallenges
Forum indexCanon EOS-1D / 5D / 6D TalkChange forum

5d Mark III low iso poor performance.

Started 11 months ago | Discussion thread
gigamel
gigamel
Regular Member • Posts: 178
Like?
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
In reply to schmegg, 11 months ago

SILLY YOU!! - The OP asked about "low ISO", Dohhh!

And that is VERY disappointing that Canon is still stuck with 2005 tech performance

And even the $7000 1Dx cant save Canon - same horrible banding as 5D3:

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1032&message=41684369

schmegg wrote:

gigamel wrote:

Yeah, but it is still VERY disappointing that 2012, $3500 Canon tech cant beat 2008 Nikon tech, right?!!

Wrong. The 5D3 shoots video. It has much higher resolution. Better LCD. Much better viewfinder. More capable AF system. Wider ISO range. Dual card slots. Higher burst rate. Better buffer. Lighter body ....

Oh - but you aren't considering any of that are you. Silly me!

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted byWhen
5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
Alexandros Trichos
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
David Hull
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
Mikael Risedal
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
David Hull
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
Ogjetaknight
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
Ferrari_Alex
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
carlk
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
chippy_jersey
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
Ogjetaknight
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
scott_mcleod
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
MayaTlab0
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
Ogjetaknight
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
studio311
11 months ago
Useless reply - I can't help it.
Juhn
11 months ago
defective may be?
kevindar
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
Alexandros Trichos
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
Ogjetaknight
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
Alexandros Trichos
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
snapperZ
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
Alexandros Trichos
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
Shane Pope
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
thelensmeister
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance. variations
Mikael Risedal
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
octane2
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
Shane Pope
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
Volksgti81
11 months ago
Oh boy
Schwany
11 months ago
Re: Oh boy
Alexandros Trichos
11 months ago
Re: Oh boy
Peter 13
11 months ago
Re: Oh boy
Alexandros Trichos
11 months ago
Re: Oh boy
paul johe
11 months ago
Re: Oh boy
Ogjetaknight
11 months ago
Take it back
David Hull
11 months ago
Re: Take it back
MayaTlab0
11 months ago
Re: Take it back
paul johe
11 months ago
Re: Take it back
David Hull
11 months ago
Re: Take it back
Alexandros Trichos
11 months ago
Re: Take it back
bobbidog
11 months ago
Re: Take it back
Deorum
11 months ago
Re: Take it back
Alexandros Trichos
11 months ago
Re: Take it back
kelpdiver
11 months ago
Why couldn't you do deliberate underexposure in PP? nt
Apewithacamera
11 months ago
Re: Take it back
gdanmitchell
11 months ago
Re: Take it back
tmr
11 months ago
Re: Take it back
ron purdy
11 months ago
Re: Take it back
John Sheehy
11 months ago
Re: Take it back
Alexandros Trichos
11 months ago
Re: Take it back
MayaTlab0
11 months ago
Re: Take it back
MOD schmegg
11 months ago
Re: Take it back
John Sheehy
11 months ago
Re: Take it back
MayaTlab0
11 months ago
Two examples
Kreitmann
11 months ago
Re: Take it back
Hans Kruse
11 months ago
Re: Take it back
Phil Hill
11 months ago
Re: Take it back
gdanmitchell
11 months ago
Re: Take it back
David Hull
11 months ago
Re: Take it back
Ogjetaknight
11 months ago
Re: Take it back
Alexandros Trichos
11 months ago
Re: Take it back
Ogjetaknight
11 months ago
Re: Take it back
David Hull
11 months ago
Re: Take it back
rwbaron
11 months ago
OK, I took a look at the RAW files
David Hull
11 months ago
Re: OK, I took a look at the RAW files
Ogjetaknight
11 months ago
Re: OK, I took a look at the RAW files
David Hull
11 months ago
Re: OK, I took a look at the RAW files
Ogjetaknight
11 months ago
Re: OK, I took a look at the RAW files
David Hull
11 months ago
Re: Take it back
gdanmitchell
11 months ago
Re: Take it back
Ogjetaknight
11 months ago
Re: Take it back
Alexandros Trichos
11 months ago
Re: Take it back
Ogjetaknight
11 months ago
Re: Take it back
carlk
11 months ago
You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
gigamel
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
octane2
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
gigamel
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
MOD schmegg
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
gigamel
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
MOD schmegg
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
gigamel
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
MOD schmegg
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
gigamel
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
MOD schmegg
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
gigamel
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
ron purdy
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
MOD schmegg
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
David Hull
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
gigamel
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
David Hull
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
gigamel
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
MOD schmegg
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
gigamel
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
gdanmitchell
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
David Hull
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
Alexandros Trichos
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
Alexandros Trichos
11 months ago
Re: You need to read all the posts in your thread
Ogjetaknight
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
David Hull
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
WalterSrChat
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
Alexandros Trichos
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
Ogjetaknight
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
MayaTlab0
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
Alexandros Trichos
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
Mikael Risedal
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
David Hull
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
rwbaron
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
Mikael Risedal
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
gdanmitchell
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
gigamel
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
Ogjetaknight
11 months ago
Re: You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows
Mikael Risedal
11 months ago
I'm sorry to hear that the 1Dx truth insulted you.
WalterSrChat
11 months ago
absolutely, definitively, and positiviely, not normal
kevindar
11 months ago
Re: absolutely, definitively, and positiviely, not normal
Schwany
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
Ross Murphy
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
cpkuntz
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
birdbrain
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
gdanmitchell
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
rwbaron
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
Snaphappykiwi
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
Alexandros Trichos
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
Snaphappykiwi
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
jhal
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
Snaphappykiwi
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
jhal
11 months ago
Maybe next time, avoid the hyperbole and provocation
Rick Knepper
11 months ago
Re: Maybe next time, avoid the hyperbole and provocation
Hans Kruse
11 months ago
Re: Maybe next time, avoid the hyperbole and provocation
Mikael Risedal
11 months ago
Re: Maybe next time, avoid the hyperbole and provocation
studio311
11 months ago
Re: Maybe next time, avoid the hyperbole and provocation
David Hull
11 months ago
Re: Maybe next time, avoid the hyperbole and provocation
Mikael Risedal
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
fwampler
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance.
psuser
11 months ago
JPEG quality used for posted samples....
Jim Cockfield
11 months ago
Same old same old
Schwany
11 months ago
Re: Same old same old yep same old tech since 2003
Mikael Risedal
11 months ago
Re: Same old same old yep same old tech since 2003
Hans Kruse
11 months ago
Re: Same old same old yep same old tech since 2003
Mikael Risedal
11 months ago
Re: Same old same old yep same old tech since 2003
Hans Kruse
11 months ago
Re: Same old same old yep same old tech since 2003
Mikael Risedal
11 months ago
Re: Same old same old yep same old tech since 2003
David Hull
11 months ago
Re: Same old same old yep same old tech since 2003
Skip M
11 months ago
So why Canon DSLR outsell Nikon's 4:1?
Al_10D
11 months ago
Re: So why Canon DSLR outsell Nikon's 4:1?
Mikael Risedal
11 months ago
Re: So why Canon DSLR outsell Nikon's 4:1?
Al_10D
11 months ago
Re: So why Canon DSLR outsell Nikon's 4:1?
Mikael Risedal
11 months ago
Re: So why Canon DSLR outsell Nikon's 4:1?
Skip M
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance. NO YOU ARE NOT
Mikael Risedal
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance. NO YOU ARE NOT
Al_10D
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance. NO YOU ARE NOT
Mikael Risedal
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance. NO YOU ARE NOT
Mikael Risedal
11 months ago
Re: 5d Mark III low iso poor performance. NO YOU ARE NOT
Mikael Risedal
11 months ago
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow
Search on dpreview.com
Not a member? Register
Featured news stories
dpreview.com
connect.dpreview.com
gearshop.dpreview.com
Editorial content
Product database
Community
About us   Write for us   FAQ   Feedback   Interest-Based Ads   Privacy   Legal
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998 - 2013 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
Mobile site