mirrorless prices are becoming ludicrous

Started Jun 14, 2012 | Discussions thread
Lee Jay
Forum ProPosts: 43,321Gear list
Like?
Re: But there's a choice, now
In reply to Bob Tullis, Jun 15, 2012

Bob Tullis wrote:

ljfinger wrote:

As I said many times - and got lambasted for saying it - mirrorless lenses will be more expensive than equivalent full-frame lenses, and EVFs are not cheaper than OVFs. Also, they don't sell very many of these cameras compared to SLRs so they have to make up their development costs by charging higher prices on each unit. All this makes for exactly what you've pointed out - an expensive system.

For good quality one would expect 'expensive'. At least there's more than one decent expensive digital system to choose from - not so long ago there was only one option.

The people who pushed this format at first claimed the smaller sensor and lack of an OVF was going to result is dramatically lower prices. Now look what has actually happened. An OM-D kit is $250 more expensive than a similar T4i kit. An OM-D body-only is even $100 more than a 60D body-only. Low unit volume and physics has required this stuff to be more expensive than its competitors, not cheaper as was claimed.
--
Lee Jay
(see profile for equipment)

 Lee Jay's gear list:Lee Jay's gear list
Canon ELPH 500 HS Canon PowerShot SX260 HS Canon EOS 5D Canon EOS 20D Canon EOS 550D +23 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
mmm,New
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow