would you buy a 36mp iso 25 m43 camera?

Started Jun 7, 2012 | Discussions thread
Forum ProPosts: 26,133
Re: iso25 vs. iso100
In reply to Steen Bay, Jun 9, 2012

Steen Bay wrote:

The reason why I would prefer the iso100 version is that lower base ISO on the iso25 version (at least in this case/example) comes at the cost of a 4x higher read noise across the whole ISO range. Both versions will lose app. 1 stop of DR each time the ISO is increased 1 stop above base ISO, meaning that the iso25 version would have 2 stops less DR than the iso100 version at iso100 and above, and that's IMO a too high price to pay for the higher base ISO SNR on the iso25 version.

Other views might vary. Photo for photo, the 36MP 25ISO version would behave exactly like the D800, and no-one is complaining about its low light performance. The only constraint is the lack of f/0.7 lenses for the real low light stuff, but that is it. With an f/1.4 prime it could do everything that a D800 with a f/2.8 would do.

-- hide signature --


Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow