Edge test, 7D,300 2.8mm ll vs. 300mm 2.8 l

Started Jun 6, 2012 | Discussions thread
Veteran MemberPosts: 3,524Gear list
Agree 100%
In reply to garyknrd, Jun 6, 2012

garyknrd wrote:

Verdict for me as a birder.
Optically? on a 7D cropped body. Not worth the upgrade period.

I would add one thing - for those who do not have the mrk 1 - better get the mrk. 2 which will have better repair odds further down the line. But for pure optical performance how much more could even be expected over the old version?

Weight? worth it for a walk around lens.


OS? wroth it for a walk around lens.


These are the two reasons I'm looking at an upgrade right now. Also checked out the Nikon (if going for the D800) - the weight difference is staggering if you use it as a walk around lens (which I do).

 maiaibing's gear list:maiaibing's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Mark II Canon EOS 70D Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM Canon EF 135mm f/2.0L USM Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM +7 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow