Surprised K-01 Rated So Low For Value

Started May 31, 2012 | Discussions thread
LiquidSilver
Forum MemberPosts: 80
Like?
Re: Surprised K-01 Rated So Low For Value
In reply to mervis50, May 31, 2012

mervis50 wrote:

If I just want to take the best possible pictures with the cleanest possible files (which I know doesn't really interest you), I wouldn't by a MOR fourthirds happycam with a plastic lens.

For me it is a different story. I'm pretty satisfied whit the IQ of my camera, and I think it would be the same with a random modern camera. (at least for RAW)

What I feel I need usually is:

  • using a good and right lens

  • a body that help me to take the shot in the most convenient way, to get that theoretical IQ of the sensor in real-life shooting.

For example, you can't take any picture if your camera doesn't get the focus.

I have see some photos of your diary. They are nice, but why do you think they are representative of the K-01 "superior" IQ? How can I judge by seeing them resized for web? Every modern camera could have taken them, even an happycam with a plastic lens.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
biasNew
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow