70-200 2.8L non-IS

Started May 27, 2012 | Discussions thread
gdanmitchell
Veteran MemberPosts: 7,730
Like?
Re: 70-200 2.8L non-IS
In reply to mmullen, May 29, 2012

mmullen wrote:

gdanmitchell wrote:

A few people who have mentioned in their own posts that they make significant use of the f/4 version of the 70-200mm lens....

... I'm not sure what the significance of the f/4 lens is to the discussion. The OP asked about the 70-200 f/2.8 vs. the 70-200 f/2.8 IS II.

It can be difficult to track the sequence of posts in a thread like this one, but if you go back and look at my earlier (first?) post about the factors that the OP was considering you will understand that there is a logical sequence here. My original point was (and is) that image quality is the least significant difference among the group of excellent 70-200mm zooms from Canon. Another poster suggested that the f/4 lens has some significant image quality deficiencies in comparison to one of the f/2.8 options, and named several supposed deficiencies.

That poster is quoted in my reply, which I chose to make mostly in the form of photographs rather than words, and which demonstrates (to the extent possible with jogs - it is so hard to post prints!) my experience that, again, image quality from all of the 70-200mm lenses is outstanding.

Dan

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow