70-200 2.8L non-IS

Started May 27, 2012 | Discussions thread
Stilograph
Regular MemberPosts: 280
Like?
Re: 70-200 2.8L non-IS
In reply to mmullen, May 28, 2012

I have the non-IS version, my friend has IS Mk I. We did a comparison back in back. Conclusion was indeed, that the non IS was a little bit slower when focusing on rapidly moving subjects, birds and such. But we could not see the diffrence in static shots.

One thing I do remember though, is that when using 200mm focal length, IS was helpful when framing the shot.

Don't know about the IS Mk II, never used it.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow