|
Re: beautiful, but ...
In reply to Octane,
May 24, 2012
|
Octane wrote:
I'm not sure this is a good example. Nothing wrong with this beautiful image, but since you were shooting a stitched panorama, the resolution of the camera makes little difference. A lower res camera can produce the exact same detail, it just needs more individual photos.
--
-------David-------
Well, almost. He would also need a different lens to get the exact same output. If the duck in the image is say 500 pixels, he would need a longer reaching lens to keep that duck at 500 pixels with the lower resolution sensor. Am I wrong?
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2012 | |||
| May 24, 2012 | |||
| May 24, 2012 | |||
| May 24, 2012 | |||
| May 24, 2012 | |||
| May 24, 2012 | |||
| May 24, 2012 | |||
| May 24, 2012 | |||
| May 24, 2012 | |||
| May 24, 2012 | |||
| May 24, 2012 | |||
| May 24, 2012 | |||
| May 24, 2012 | |||
| May 24, 2012 | |||
| May 24, 2012 | |||
| May 24, 2012 | |||
| May 24, 2012 | |||
| May 24, 2012 | |||
| May 24, 2012 | |||
| May 25, 2012 | |||
| May 25, 2012 | |||
| May 25, 2012 | |||
| May 26, 2012 |
   |
|
Connect with dpreview
|
