the 12-35 to much of a compromise

Started May 21, 2012 | Discussions thread
thinkfat
Senior MemberPosts: 1,179Gear list
Like?
Re: the 12-35 to much of a compromise
In reply to tgutgu, May 23, 2012

tgutgu wrote:

The arguments are getting increasingly crazy due to the obsession about shallow DOF. It is as if only images with shallow DOF are aesthetically acceptable! What a wrong perception!

Honestly, I have seen more images broken due to not enough DOf than vice versa. To me the increased DOF is one of the major advantages of m4/3.

Quite certainly true. I have botched a lot of group shots indoors with a 1.4/50mm on 135 film. The film was only 400 ISO (acceptable grain), prompting for a wide aperture to have sufficient shutter speed. The situation in digital would be the same. I'd have to go for 800 or 1600 ISO, while I could have done the same shot with a MFT camera at 400, leveraging the shorter focal length and consequently deeper DoF.

The noise advantage of current FF cameras over MFT is probably about two stops, maybe a little more, however many times you can not actually make use of it.

-- hide signature --

Everybody loves gadgets, until they try to make them
http://www.flickr.com/photos/thinkfat
http://thinkfat.blogspot.com

 thinkfat's gear list:thinkfat's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Mark II Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH1 Panasonic Lumix G Vario 14-45mm F3.5-5.6 ASPH OIS Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Canon EF 100mm f/2.0 USM +10 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow