Why Nikon won't make a D300(S) replacement

Started May 22, 2012 | Discussions thread
Regular MemberPosts: 210
Re: Why Nikon won't make a D300(S) replacement
In reply to Antony John, May 22, 2012

Antony John wrote:

I want 16 MP, I want 24 MP
I want good high ISO noise performance (irrespective of sensor MP)
I want 5 FPS, I want 15 FPS
I want a lightweight body, I want an 'FMJ' body
No more than $1,500, $2500 is OK

I want the latest CAM module operable to F8, I want one that focuses succesfully 100% of the time under all conditions
Number must be DXXX to show it's a (semi) pro body
You don't need a (semi) pro DX camera, the D800(E) has a DX mode.
Did I miss anything?

Give this specification to a design team and ask them for a camera that fits the bill.
Comments are 'tongue in cheek'

Actually, IMHO, the reason a D300(s) body isn't made is just because it isn't profitable. For some reason, the 7D sells well. If Canon doesn't make a Mark 2 version of 7D, there's no reason Nikon should even think of a D400.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow