|
Re: silly
In reply to Harry Sinniah,
May 16, 2012
|
Harry,
I agree that that may be the case here. But the original poster is positing some hunches. Certainly seems the most rational course of action (especially someone so vigilant) would be to call the retailer.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2012 | |||
| May 16, 2012 | |||
| May 16, 2012 | |||
| May 16, 2012 | |||
| May 16, 2012 | |||
| May 16, 2012 | |||
| May 16, 2012 | |||
| May 16, 2012 | |||
| May 16, 2012 | |||
| May 16, 2012 | |||
| May 16, 2012 | |||
| May 16, 2012 | |||
| May 16, 2012 | |||
| May 16, 2012 | |||
| May 16, 2012 |