Kirk Tuck says OM-D is shot across the bow

Started May 12, 2012 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Senior MemberPosts: 1,284Gear list
Re: What would be the point?
In reply to PerL, May 14, 2012

PerL wrote:

When Oly made a 300 2.8 for the 4/3 system the price was almost twice as high as the 300 2.8s from Nikon and Canon, because Oly claimed it should be compared to a 600 mm.

That is indeed the only thing that galls me, the price of the SHG and some of the m43 lenses. I coughed up for the 12-60 as it still is quite unique in its capabilities (I know there is a Nikon "equivalent").

The whole package (camera + lens) will still be smaller (even if it's not that much), and that is what counts for me (don't care about weight). Ask all those who are waiting since I do not know when for a fullframe sensor in an OM-D to K-5 sized body.

And please nobody starts that "not-able-to-be-shooting-a-large-lens-on-small-body-with-one-hand"-argument again.

"Blue for the shattered sky"

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow