A laugh out loud Ken Rockwell moment, and a serious question

I think the largest difference between film and digital is that digital enables different shooting styles. With digital it is easier and cheaper to shoot first and think later. With film, it's almost necessary to think first and shoot later. I don't think either style is superior to other. Difference style for different tools. And nothing forces digital photogs to shoot first and think later. I know some photographers who can and will get the picture they want with a one frame. Anyway, they are happy they can confirm the success right a way and if necessary reshoot.

Anyway, using film doesn't necessary mean photographer thinks before shoots. As was a case with one of the finlands most famous nature photographer who shot bats and when he developed the film, got 36 black frames. And same day one amateur photographer (with no surplus money to develop ten rolls of film to get one picture) developed a film which had almost half of its frames succesful (same topic, bats).