A laugh out loud Ken Rockwell moment, and a serious question

Started May 5, 2012 | Discussions thread
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
David H Dennis
Regular MemberPosts: 277Gear list
Like?
A laugh out loud Ken Rockwell moment, and a serious question
May 5, 2012

Okay. This is just for my amusement, because he made such a comically outrageous statement I felt it needed to be debunked.

Ken Rockwell suggests that shooting with "real Nikons", aka film cameras, is not only more satisfying than digital, but cheaper!

http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/00-new-today.htm

Film, he says, costs "only 50c a shot".

If I'd spent $0.50 per shot on photos I've taken digitally, I'd be bankrupt! I have well over 60,000 pictures on my D300, since I bought it in November 2008.

50c a shot is $30,000 over about 3.5 years, or $8,571 a year!

Well, that's for printing every photo, which you really need to do in order to see it. But what if you don't? Well, his figure of $0.14 for developing alone is still going to be $8,400 over 3.5 years, or $2,400 a year. That's enough to repurchase my D300 outfit every year.

My D300 outfit (with memory card and 18-200) cost me $2,500. I upgraded to a 24-70 f/2.8 for $1,800. I bought a cheapo used manual Tamron off Craigslist for $75. I bought a 32GB memory card for $80. This means I've spent $4,455 on photography over 3.5 years, or about $1,272 a year.

Clearly in my case, it is much, much, much less expensive to shoot digital.

But this leads me to a question, out of curiosity. Let's do a survey. How many pictures have you taken on your current camera body (if close to replacement) or your last one (if you just replaced it)? Is Ken Rockwell right in saying most reasonably serious photographers take under 20,000 pictures over the life of their DSLRs? That sounds ludicrously inaccurate, at least if my experience is any guide.

Ken does have one really good point. I seem to remember the old film cameras had decent manuals. His description is on the point: "My 5-year old can figure it out, while not even I can figure out most of how to get a D800 to go. The F3's owner's manual is only 46 pages of well-illustrated simplicity, while the D800's manual is 450 pages of meaningless menu nonsense."

I have been reading the D4 manual and it is nearly incomprehensible. It lists the menu items but doesn't explain what they do in any sort of systemic way. You pretty much have to know the D3/D3S/D4 series of cameras to make any sense out of the manual for the D3/D3S/D4 series of cameras.

So another fun question: What are your favorite third party books for the D4/D800 and predecessors?

(I apologize to those who hate Ken Rockwell as a subject of discussion. That's why I put his name in the subject line, so you could ignore this if you want.)

D

 David H Dennis's gear list:David H Dennis's gear list
Nikon D4 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED Canon Pixma Pro9000 Mark II
Nikon D3 Nikon D300 Nikon D4 Nikon D800
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow