Who needs slightly smaller cameras?

Started May 1, 2012 | Discussions thread
brent collins
Senior MemberPosts: 1,923
Like?
Re: lots of reasons
In reply to Lee Jay, May 1, 2012

To you maybe. You obviously can't understand that once I realized the 4/3 does enough for the walk-around town stuff...etc, I stopped lugging the 7D and all the L lenses on every outing. It's not a matter of ounces. Sling bag, wrist strap, EVF and one extra lens. Someways it's all I need and here is the part you don't get.....it's all I want. Can I carry a 40lb bag up a 3000ft elevation that is only 1.5 miles (read as STEEP)? Of course I can and i can do it without breaking a sweat, but I have nothing to prove. I've done it many times. Who cares. I now choose the 4/3 and the pics are good enough.

ljfinger wrote:

brent collins wrote:

Did not comprehend the part about my 4/3 being my everyday camera?

Surgery was over a year ago and my body is more able than most.

So the size difference shouldn't make any difference any more.

-- hide signature --

Lee Jay
(see profile for equipment)

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
why?New
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow