|
Re: The Tiny Guys, 60D 100mm macro with raynox msn 202
In reply to SteB,
May 1, 2012
|
Hi SteB, thanks for the nice comments, I was after the MP-E 65mm but now can justify the price and size of the lens, ie the size it extends to, I would have to get the twin flash to do the mpe65 justice so just opted for the raynox 202, I have been using the raynox 250 but needed that extra power and the raynox msn 505 is to much for my needs.
SteB wrote:
An impressive set. The Raynox MSN-202 with a 100mm macro would probably be my preferred way of getting this magnfication if I didn't have an MP-E 65mm. In fact it used to be before I got that lens. The Raynox lenses have always been underestimated. With a good lens they give very good results.
--
thx mark. (kalimistuk)
my pics at,
http://www.flickr.com/photos/kalimistuk/
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Mark-Watson-Photography/115986328416570
my Highspeed pics at,
http://www.flickr.com/photos/kalimistuk/sets/72157594566402216/
my Macro pics at,
http://www.flickr.com/photos/kalimistuk/sets/72157594487257853/
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2012 | |||
| May 1, 2012 | |||
| May 1, 2012 | |||
| May 1, 2012 | |||
| May 2, 2012 |
   |
|
Connect with dpreview
|
