Lens advice moving to FF

Started Apr 27, 2012 | Discussions thread
filmluvr
Veteran MemberPosts: 3,093
Like?
Re: Lens advice moving to FF
In reply to MBru1, Apr 28, 2012

MBru1 wrote:

If I do decide to buy something to replace the 10-22, my options would be 16-35/2.8L or the 17-40/4L.  However, I'm not sure if either is worth the price considering the overlap with the 24-105.

The ultrawide coverage provided by either of Canon's UWA zooms is in no way comparable to that of the 24-105mm. There's a huge difference between 16/17mm and 24mm, and the fact that they extend a little into the range of the 24-105mm only means you don't have to change lenses as often. Of course, this is all irrelevant if you never shoot UWA. Personally, I'd sooner give up photography than be without the wide side of 20mm.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow