Is there any sane reason... BIG FILE!

Started Apr 19, 2012 | Discussions thread
Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee
Veteran MemberPosts: 5,802Gear list
Like?
Re: YES
In reply to Daniel Clune, Apr 20, 2012

Daniel Clune wrote:

What if you had shot a landscape scene with small trees in background and wanted those trees on a large print to be visable rather than just MUSH.

I'd be obsessional, and I'm not. Would you send back a Rembrandt or a Leonarda and ask for more detail. Image is what matters, not ultradetail.

Or how about your shooting wildlife and you are allready useing a 800mm lens but still need to crop, again more rez could be very handy.

It could be, but sneaking closer which is what wildlife photographers do, is more effective.

Just because 21 meg is enough for you sure doesnt mean it applies to others. You have to come out of that bubble your in and realize others might need other things from there equipment.

I'm resisiting the urge to correct the spelling! We all type incorrectly..

-- hide signature --

I looked at your Pbase Gallery.
Superb.
You didn't need huge megapixels for them now, did you??!!

-- hide signature --

NĂ­or bhris focal maith fiacail riamh (Irish Gaelic)
A good word never broke a tooth.

 Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee's gear list:Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee's gear list
Canon PowerShot S90 Fujifilm X10 Canon EOS-1Ds Mark III Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 Canon EOS-1D Mark IV +27 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
YESNew
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow