Is there any sane reason... BIG FILE!

Started Apr 19, 2012 | Discussions thread
Lea5
Contributing MemberPosts: 551Gear list
Like?
not at all
In reply to altenae, Apr 19, 2012

I still have my D3X with 24.5 MP and it is plenty. No need for a D800 with a diffraction limit of F 5.6. I use my D3X for my daily work in the studio and I won't sell it for another camera. Often I don't need the 24.5 MP and work in 10.5 MP crop format. It's enough for the most images in flyers, brochures, catalogs, handouts etc.

altenae wrote:

Rick Knepper wrote:
Yes, stop the BS. I think the number may be closer to 95%.

altenae wrote:

Just stop this BS high MP is good or bad.
I think only 5% will benefit from this MP increase

-- hide signature --

Rick Knepper, photographer, photography never for sale, check my profile for gear list and philosophy.

You are saying 95% will actually need more then 21 MP for there output ?
You really believe this !!!
--
Enjoy Photography
http://www.wildlife-photos.net

 Lea5's gear list:Lea5's gear list
Nikon D4 Nikon D800E Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR Nikon AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED +4 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
YESNew
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow