|
Re: Are there any DSLRs at the X-Pro1's price-point with equivalent image quality?
In reply to rosskoss,
Apr 16, 2012
|
the answer is simple enough
5D MK II, better than XPro1 except the size.
rosskoss wrote:
Lets keep this simple and restrict to APS-C Canon/Nikon DSLRs with commonly available lenses. Yes, the X-Pro1 is not the most intuitive, is somewhat quirky and has performance issues, but when it comes to IQ, I've not seen better photos anywhere. It's truly something special.
BTW, I'm not a current XP1 owner...just a prospective buyer trying to juggle the IQ, feature-list, performance and bang-for-the-buck equation. The other camera that I'm considering and actually more attracted to is the OM-D however, IQ doesn't seem as good as XP1, especially at higher ISOs. And as the title indicates, I haven't completely ruled out DSLRs.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2012 | |||
| Apr 15, 2012 | |||
| Apr 16, 2012 | |||
| Apr 16, 2012 | |||
| Apr 16, 2012 | |||
| Apr 16, 2012 | |||
| Apr 16, 2012 | |||
| Apr 16, 2012 | |||
| Apr 16, 2012 | |||
| Apr 16, 2012 | |||
| Apr 16, 2012 | |||
| Apr 16, 2012 | |||
| Apr 16, 2012 | |||
| Apr 16, 2012 | |||
| Apr 16, 2012 |