What went wrong with Photography?

Started Apr 8, 2012 | Discussions thread
StephanSwiss
New MemberPosts: 22
Like?
Re: should be Digital Photography *Equipment* Review
In reply to T3, Apr 15, 2012

T3 wrote:

Technically, it should be "Digital Photography Equipment Review", because from day one this site has been reviewing digital photography equipment . It has never reviewed actual photography produced by various photographers. The review in Digital Photography Review clearly pertains to the review of equipment . I guess the operators of this site assumed people would be intelligent enough to infer this from the content of the site; they didn't think they need to spell it out explicitly to people that this site was mainly about equipment.

So you measure the intelligence of people by how many words one can leave out and others still can get it? Why not call this site 'D' then, the rest is perfectly clear. Or did you simply want to state that I'm slow witted?

-- hide signature --
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow