|
Re: I thought the omd was supposed to be smallish?
In reply to Adventsam,
Apr 10, 2012
|
... hmm, not in my eyes. At least the RAW files of the E-M5 seem a bit better to me - less salt-and-pepper noise, same amount or slightly more detail (developped in RawTherapee).
The dynamic range of the E-M5 seems to be a bit better too according to this test here:
You could be right with the video though. All in all I think it will come down to taste which camera to prefer. I'm quite interested in dpreview's take on the E-M5 and the DXOmark results.
Cheers
Frank
--
http://naturfotos.bplaced.net/Mix/
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 11, 2012 | |||
| Apr 11, 2012 | |||
| Apr 11, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 11, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 10, 2012 | |||
| Apr 11, 2012 | |||
| Apr 11, 2012 | |||
| Apr 11, 2012 | |||
| Apr 11, 2012 | |||
| Apr 11, 2012 |