
19 hours ago
|
Re: Corsica sample image resized to 12.8 MP and back (shocking)
In reply to oscarvdvelde,
Mar 5, 2012
|
oscarvdvelde wrote:
The test:
1) Downloaded the Corsica image.
2) Resized from 5760x3840 to 4368x2912 (12.8 MP, EOS 5D) - bilinear looked best
3) Resized back from 4368x2912 to 5760x3840, bilinear
4) Applied sharpening, radius 1 pixel, 125 strength (I used Paint.NET with Sharpen+ plugin)
The result (original file at the right)
Pretty amazing. Thanks! I was often not quite happy with foliage rendering of my 5D (12.8 MP) when viewed at 100%; however these samples from the 5D Mk. III at the Canon site look like a bad joke in comparison.
Judging from your test, one could just as well keep the original 5D for landscapes - which btw. has proven to provide better shadow detail than the Mk. II.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 6, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 6, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 7, 2012 | |||
| Mar 6, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 6, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 6, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 6, 2012 | |||
| Mar 6, 2012 | |||
| Mar 6, 2012 | |||
| Mar 6, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 6, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 5, 2012 | |||
| Mar 6, 2012 |