QUICK LINKS:VideosSample ImagesCamera TimelineLink Directory

connect.dpreview.com geasrshop.dpreview.com

News ReviewsBuying GuideSample Images Articles Cameras Lenses Printers Software Forums Galleries Challenges

Forum indexOlympus SLR TalkChange forum

How good was the 14-54 version I?

Started Feb 29, 2012 | Discussion thread

Parent

First

Previous

SRT201

Senior Member • Posts: 1,839

Like?

How good was the 14-54 version I?

Feb 29, 2012

How did the Version 1 compare to the version II in terms of IQ. I know the aperture was improved and the macro capability was added. Also CDAF capability was added.

Still, was the original on par with the version II assuming it didn't have quite as nice a bokeh?

--

Life is NOT measured by the "moments that take your breath away" anymore than books are measured by the number of exclamation marks.

Reply to thread Reply with quote Complain

Parent

First

Previous

Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
How good was the 14-54 version I?	SRT201	Feb 29, 2012
Re: How good was the 14-54 version I?	Trevor Stevens	Feb 29, 2012
MII has rounder blades, not more	rovingtim	Feb 29, 2012
Re: How good was the 14-54 version I?	Retro Joe	Feb 29, 2012
Re: How good was the 14-54 version I?	MarceloLI	Feb 29, 2012
Re: How good was the 14-54 version I?	Ulfric M Douglas	Feb 29, 2012
Just got one on eBay	SRT201	Feb 29, 2012
Re: Just got one on eBay	Sierra Dave	Feb 29, 2012
Re: Just got one on eBay	SRT201	Feb 29, 2012
Re: Just got one on eBay	Jay Jenner	Feb 29, 2012
Re: How good was the 14-54 version I?	Gary Blake	Feb 29, 2012
Re: How good was the 14-54 version I?	petrocan	Feb 29, 2012
Re: How good was the 14-54 version I?	SRT201	Feb 29, 2012
Re: How good was the 14-54 version I?	Ulfric M Douglas	Feb 29, 2012
Even though mine isn't CDAF compatible...	mring1	Feb 29, 2012
Re: How good was the 14-54 version I?	mrmut	Feb 29, 2012
Re: How good was the 14-54 version I?	SRT201	Feb 29, 2012
Re: How good was the 14-54 version I?	Ulfric M Douglas	Feb 29, 2012
Re: How good was the 14-54 version I?	petrocan	Feb 29, 2012
Ulfric...	mring1	Feb 29, 2012
Re: How good was the 14-54 version I?	SRT201	Mar 1, 2012
Re: How good was the 14-54 version I?	SRT201	Mar 1, 2012
Everything is good when it works.	mrmut	Mar 4, 2012
Re: Everything is good when it works.	SRT201	Mar 5, 2012
It was very good...	AntnioGM	Feb 29, 2012
Never doubt it	faith_ps	Feb 29, 2012
Re: How good was the 14-54 version I?	JustFred	Mar 1, 2012
Enough said! :-)	daddyo	Mar 1, 2012
Re: How good was the 14-54 version I?	John Iversen	Mar 1, 2012
Re: How good was the 14-54 version I?	sd40	Mar 1, 2012
Re: How good was the 14-54 version I?	GNapp Studios	Mar 1, 2012
Re: How good was the 14-54 version I?	SRT201	Mar 1, 2012
Re: How good was the 14-54 version I?	pftate1	Mar 1, 2012
Re: How good was the 14-54 version I?	SRT201	Mar 1, 2012
Re: How good was the 14-54 version I?	pftate1	Mar 1, 2012
Re: How good was the 14-54 version I?	eaa	Mar 1, 2012
Re: How good was the 14-54 version I?	pftate1	Mar 2, 2012
Re: How good was the 14-54 version I?	John King	Mar 2, 2012
Re: How good was the 14-54 version I?	GNapp Studios	Mar 1, 2012
Re: How good was the 14-54 version I?	SRT201	Mar 1, 2012
4-54 Mk I was a kit lens	eaa	Mar 1, 2012
Re: 4-54 Mk I was a kit lens	SRT201	Mar 1, 2012
Re: 4-54 Mk I was a kit lens	jwhaide	Mar 5, 2012
Re: 4-54 Mk I was a kit lens	SRT201	Mar 5, 2012
Got my 14-54	SRT201	Mar 4, 2012
Re: Got my 14-54	John King	Mar 4, 2012
Re: Got my 14-54	SRT201	Mar 4, 2012
Re: How good was the 14-54 version I?	aja2	Mar 4, 2012
Re: How good was the 14-54 version I?	xtforest	Mar 4, 2012
I almost sold mine	herebefore	Mar 4, 2012
Keep it!	Knight Palm	Mar 4, 2012
Not perfect, but very good	SRT201	Mar 5, 2012
Re: Not perfect, but very good	SRT201	Mar 5, 2012
Re: Not perfect, but very good	Ulfric M Douglas	Mar 5, 2012
Re: Not perfect, but very good	kjunom	Mar 5, 2012

Parent

First

Previous

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

About us Write for us FAQ Feedback Interest-Based Ads Privacy Legal

All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998 - 2013 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.

Mobile site