Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
seriously, 36 megapixels?	james s. kennedy	Feb 27, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	73Bronco	Feb 27, 2012
seriously, D800 is certainly not for you.	ddt332	Feb 27, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	Leonard Shepherd	Feb 27, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	Luke Kaven	Feb 27, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	Clayton1985	Feb 27, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	Leif Goodwin	Feb 27, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	Leos	Feb 27, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	noneyabidnis	Feb 27, 2012
further resources...	noneyabidnis	Feb 27, 2012
Also, just in case	noneyabidnis	Feb 27, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	bobn2	Feb 27, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	Frank Stein	Feb 27, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	Rich Rosen	Feb 27, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	Cultured Vulture	Feb 27, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	Frank Stein	Feb 27, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	Cultured Vulture	Feb 27, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	Frank Stein	Feb 27, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	John Motts	Feb 27, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	bewing77	Feb 28, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	Gevork Mosesi	Mar 1, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	Leif Goodwin	Mar 1, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	Leif Goodwin	Feb 27, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	John Motts	Feb 27, 2012
No, his post WAS condescending and OFFENSIVE.	bbbinohio	Feb 27, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	Leif Goodwin	Feb 27, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	Robin Casady	Feb 27, 2012
But I print at 360 dpi	tony field	Feb 27, 2012
Re: But I print at 360 dpi	Robin Casady	Feb 27, 2012
360 is somewhat better.	tony field	Feb 27, 2012
Re: 360 is somewhat better.	RedFox88	Feb 29, 2012
dpi does not equal ppi	RedFox88	Feb 29, 2012
Re: But I print at 360 dpi	Anthony	Feb 29, 2012
Re: But I print at 360 dpi	Robin Casady	Feb 29, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	Tiger1	Feb 27, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	lanef	Feb 27, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	AgentHEX	Feb 27, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	Ilkka Nissilä	Feb 27, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	marike6	Feb 27, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	Ilkka Nissilä	Feb 28, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	Leif Goodwin	Feb 27, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	AgentHEX	Feb 27, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	Leif Goodwin	Feb 28, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	Ilkka Nissilä	Feb 28, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	Leif Goodwin	Feb 28, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	Ilkka Nissilä	Feb 28, 2012
As they say...	reginalddwight	Feb 27, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	Makkara	Feb 27, 2012
Really not that extreme...	Jorgen E	Feb 27, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	ukat123	Feb 27, 2012
Yes...get over it	The Photo Ninja	Feb 27, 2012
D700s might be in the works	bgbs	Feb 27, 2012
Re: D700s might be in the works	TFergus	Feb 27, 2012
Re: D700s might be in the works	Leif Goodwin	Feb 27, 2012
Re: D700s might be in the works	TFergus	Feb 27, 2012
Re: D700s might be in the works	Leif Goodwin	Feb 28, 2012
Re: D700s might be in the works	TFergus	Feb 28, 2012
Re: D700s might be in the works	Tony Beach	Feb 28, 2012
Re: D700s might be in the works	Leif Goodwin	Feb 28, 2012
Re: D700s might be in the works	Tony Beach	Feb 28, 2012
Re: D700s might be in the works	Leif Goodwin	Feb 28, 2012
Re: D700s might be in the works	Tony Beach	Feb 29, 2012
Re: D700s might be in the works	AgentHEX	Feb 29, 2012
I give up.	Event_shooter	Feb 29, 2012
Re: D700s might be in the works	Leif Goodwin	Feb 29, 2012
Re: D700s might be in the works	AgentHEX	Feb 29, 2012
Re: D700s might be in the works	Leif Goodwin	Feb 29, 2012
Re: D700s might be in the works	AgentHEX	Feb 29, 2012
Re: D700s might be in the works	bgbs	Feb 29, 2012
A little history...	PorkBun	Feb 27, 2012
Re: A little history...	Leif Goodwin	Feb 27, 2012
Re: A little history...	AgentHEX	Feb 27, 2012
Re: A little history...	Leif Goodwin	Feb 28, 2012
Re: A little history...	AgentHEX	Feb 29, 2012
Re: A little history...	Leif Goodwin	Feb 29, 2012
Re: A little history...	AgentHEX	Feb 29, 2012
Re: A little history...	Leif Goodwin	Feb 29, 2012
Re: A little history...	AgentHEX	Feb 29, 2012
Re: A little history...	h0tsauce	Feb 27, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	CFynn	Feb 27, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	cluna	Feb 27, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	carlk	Feb 27, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	AgentHEX	Feb 27, 2012
What's considered "reasonable", then?	Jorgen E	Feb 28, 2012
Re: What's considered "reasonable", then?	Robin Casady	Feb 28, 2012
Re: What's considered "reasonable", then?	AgentHEX	Feb 29, 2012
Re: What's considered "reasonable", then?	carlk	Feb 29, 2012
Re: What's considered "reasonable", then?	AgentHEX	Feb 29, 2012
Re: What's considered "reasonable", then?	carlk	Feb 29, 2012
Re: What's considered "reasonable", then?	AgentHEX	Feb 29, 2012
Re: What's considered "reasonable", then?	carlk	Feb 29, 2012
Re: What's considered "reasonable", then?	AgentHEX	Feb 29, 2012
Re: What's considered "reasonable", then?	Luke Kaven	Feb 29, 2012
Re: What's considered "reasonable", then?	carlk	Feb 29, 2012
Schmeasonable viewing distance...	J Mankila	Feb 29, 2012
Re: Schmeasonable viewing distance...	Tony Beach	Feb 29, 2012
Re: What's considered "reasonable", then?	KLO82	Feb 29, 2012
Re: What's considered "reasonable", then?	Tony Beach	Feb 29, 2012
Re: What's considered "reasonable", then?	KLO82	Feb 29, 2012
Re: What's considered "reasonable", then?	AgentHEX	Mar 1, 2012
Re: What's considered "reasonable", then?	Tony Beach	Mar 1, 2012
Re: What's considered "reasonable", then?	John Motts	Mar 1, 2012
Re: What's considered "reasonable", then?	carlk	Mar 1, 2012
Re: What's considered "reasonable", then?	Tony Beach	Mar 1, 2012
Re: What's considered "reasonable", then?	AgentHEX	Mar 2, 2012
Re: What's considered "reasonable", then?	Tony Beach	Mar 2, 2012
Re: What's considered "reasonable", then?	AgentHEX	Mar 2, 2012
Re: What's considered "reasonable", then?	carlk	Mar 2, 2012
Re: What's considered "reasonable", then?	AgentHEX	Mar 2, 2012
Re: What's considered "reasonable", then?	Tony Beach	Mar 2, 2012
Re: What's considered "reasonable", then?	Tony Beach	Mar 2, 2012
Re: What's considered "reasonable", then?	AgentHEX	Mar 2, 2012
Re: What's considered "reasonable", then?	Tony Beach	Mar 2, 2012
Re: What's considered "reasonable", then?	AgentHEX	Mar 3, 2012
Re: What's considered "reasonable", then?	carlk	Feb 29, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	73Bronco	Feb 27, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	Londongal	Feb 27, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	ricko5	Feb 28, 2012
Good point! (nt)	Jorgen E	Feb 28, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	u007	Feb 28, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	Cultured Vulture	Feb 28, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	Luke Kaven	Feb 28, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	Cultured Vulture	Feb 28, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	Luke Kaven	Feb 28, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	Tony Beach	Feb 28, 2012
OP prefers a P&S, so that says it all to me	Tony Beach	Feb 28, 2012
Re: seriously, 36 megapixels?	danharperphotography.com	Mar 12, 2012

Forum

Parent

First

Next unread

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

This is why to shoot in RAW	120
Why are DSLRs left home 90.2% of the time	108
Nikon AF-S 85mm f/1.4 lens not so hot.	83
Does anybody shoot 16:9?	80
Did Nikon screw up?	48
OH MY GOD THE GX2 OH MY GOD	46
Show us ONE of your recent favorite picture and...	42
Micro Four Thirds body deflation	38
Does DPreview waste your time, too?	33
If the GX2 really had . . .	33
Firmware upgrade causes AF slow down on 18-55!	33
*** MINI CHALLENGE 303 *** UNDER 6 MP ...	28
Old-timers were in town III.	28
Really Dumb camera can't take photos	28
<<<< Challenge 209: Results!!! >>>>	28
LX7 Over LF1	26
Advice needed. Photography student 'upgrading' ...	24
GR and X100s side by side shots	24
When size matters (D800 pixel count)	24
about new XF55/200: I've seen only now	24