80-200afs vs 70-200 vrll

Started Feb 25, 2012 | Discussions thread
azoele
Contributing MemberPosts: 629
Like?
Don't agree, sorry
In reply to apice, Feb 26, 2012

Are you sure you are not talking the VR I?
The VR II and AFS, size wise, are really close.

If it is a VR II, check whether you have a dud: I owned 2 excellent copies at the same time for a few months, and, on D700:

  • same sharpness at f2.8 in the central part of the frame.

  • same sharpness at a distance (this is critical)

  • probably VR II has better flare resistance (but the AFS has better hood).

  • Excellent bokeh on both. In really critical situations, the VR II pulls ahead: if the background is really cluttered and near the AFS can go "swirly".

  • autofocus faster on VR II. Not by a lot, but after a while, you notice it.

  • the AFS does not shrink focal when shot near. VR II does this a lot.

  • AFS vignettes quite a bit more (I didn't care at all).

To be true: they are both so good I didn't know which to choose. Testing them in real life shooting I loved them both. When tried blind testing, I couldn't pick one from the other. And I'm talking F2.8-4.

Sold the AFS, then sold the VR II. Purchased the 200F2. Now, that lens is seriously different. But the AFS and VR II are both astounding, but astounding lenses.

Lory
--

'The human race is a race of cowards. And I'm not only marching in that procession, but carrying a banner.'
Mark Twain

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow